Something is happening, Folks!

Don't you have the feeling that there is something happening out there, and you don't feel very comfortable what that might mean, whatever that is? There was no carbon based global warming back in 1540, and there is no carbon based global warming now. Pulling huge rubbery clots inside the corpses from vaccinated people who died. The majority of the vaccinated people suffer from blood disease; they are walking time bombs to be dropped dead or die slowly with extreme suffering.

Several embalmers across the country have been observing many large, and sometimes very long, “fibrous” and rubbery clots inside the corpses they treat, and are speaking out about their findings (original source).

pink and white flowers

Larry Mills, a licensed embalmer and funeral director in the state of Alabama, has been in the funeral business since 1968 and has been involved with the embalming procedure since the beginning of his career.

“We as embalmers are seeing some strange clots since the COVID outbreak. These clots are very rubbery feeling and very long as they exit the veins that we use during the embalming procedure. They really appear to be like earthworms. I have never seen this in my career until now,” Mills told The Epoch Times.

For several decades, we've been harangued by left-wing harbingers of doom, screeching at 1,000 decibels that global warming — i.e., the gradual heating of Earth's surface, oceans, and atmosphere — is caused by human activity, primarily the burning of fossil fuels that pump carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

burning woods during night time

They lecture us about the long-term rise of the planet's temperature, caused by our shameful carbon footprints, which we selfishly use to drive our cars, air-condition our homes, and generally enjoy comfortable lives. "How dare you?" They want us to believe that the planet Earth, one of millions of planets in millions of galaxies, spinning around the Sun at a thousand miles an hour, is going to be destroyed if those darned cows don't stop their terrible habit of emitting malodorous flatulence while enjoying a vegan diet.

love our planet signage

As proof of their hysterical assertions, they point to recent natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and every other snippet of "evidence" they can hang their hat on. I'm wondering when they'll blame COVID-19 on oil and gas drilling and coal mining.

  • During the 1970s, the fear was of "global cooling"

  • During the 1980s, the fear was of "acid rain"

  • During the 1980/1990, the fear was the "ozone hole"

  • During the 1990, the fear was "global warming"

garbage near forest

Less than twenty years after that tactic was exhausted by facts on the ground, the creative minds of left-wing orthodoxy arrived at a term they felt would encompass anything that happened on this huge ball of mud. "Climate change" was unveiled like a marble masterpiece in a Grecian gallery.

Over the last 30 years, the United Nations, climate scientists, and governments around the world have claimed that climate change is making natural disasters including hurricanes, floods, and heatwaves more frequent.

“Climate change has helped drive a fivefold increase in the number of weather-related disasters in the last 50 years,” reported National Public Radio last fall, citing a report by the U.N.’s World Meteorological Organization.

But the data also show that the number of climate related disasters actually declined over the last 20 years by about 10 percent.

The best-available data comes from International Disaster Database, or EM-DAT, which is collected and made public by the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) in Belgium.

Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) in Belgium

Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) in Belgium

The discovery that disasters have declined since 2000 was done by Roger Pielke, Jr., a University of Colorado, Boulder political scientist. Pielke said the finding “is very good news and completely contrary to conventional wisdom.”

EM-DAT’s finding of less frequent disasters is consistent with long-term trends. There has been 92% decline in the decadal death toll from natural disasters since its peak in the 1920s. In that decade, 5.4 million people died from natural disasters. In the 2010s, 400,000 did.

The 92% decline in deaths over the last century occurred during a period when the global population nearly quadrupled, and the global temperature rose 1.3 degrees centigrade.

Pielke finds that the cost of natural disasters globally also declined as a share of GDP between 1990 and 2020. In a 2020 review of 54 studies over the last 22 years, and published in the field’s leading scientific journal, Pielke found “little evidence to support claims that any part of the overall increase in global economic losses documented on climate time scales is attributable to human-caused changes in climate.”

Little evidence to support claims that any part of the overall increase in global economic losses documented on climate time scales is attributable to human-caused changes in climate

 Little evidence to support claims that any part of the overall increase in global economic losses documented on climate time scales is attributable to human-caused changes in climate

Pielke is who is one of the world’s leading authorities on natural disasters and climate change, has been widely published in the peer-reviewed literature, and was the first scholar to show the need to “normalize” natural disaster data, which has been accepted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change across multiple reports.

Any hot weather event you can pick out in recent years is likely overshadowed by a much worse event decades or centuries before “man-made carbon pollution” was ever a thing. For example, the media is frantic over the current drought and “record temps” in Europe this summer, warning that it could become the “worst drought” in 500 years.  Of course, this claim opens the door to a question that climate scientists and propagandists don't want to answer:  What happened 500 years ago?

A similar level of global warming hysteria was present during a heat wave in Europe in 2003, as well as in 2018.  The few climate scientists still not bought and paid for by governments and the UN have had to point out that these droughts are nothing compared to the living hell that was the drought of 1540.  This event is often termed a “mega-drought” because the region suffered historically hot temps while receiving almost no rain for a year.

Temperatures that year averaged 5 °C to 7° C above average temperatures in Europe in the 20th century.   In US terms, that means daily summer temps of around 104° F.  Hundreds of historic accounts written at the time describe around half a million deaths, along with vast wildfires and a winter in Italy that “felt like July.”  Keep in mind that carbon levels in Europe in 1540 were 30% LOWER than they are today, yet, the region suffered perhaps the worst warming event in its recorded history.

Today's climate data is based on records held by the NOAA and other institutions, and these records only go back to 1880.  So, whenever you hear the mainstream media rant about record temperatures, they are using a tiny sliver of global weather history going back a little over a century.  Any honest scientist in this field will tell you that the Earth's climate record is vast compared to the limited data used by global warming ideologues, and the majority of destructive weather crises have occurred well before man-made carbon emissions.

So, for the Dumb or Dumber under us, let us say that the carbon pollution in 1540 was caused by cars, farming and farting.

There was no carbon based global warming back then, and there is no carbon based global warming now.

Led by a Nobel Prize laureate, more than 1,100 scientists and scholars have signed a document declaring climate science is based more on personal beliefs and political agendas than sound, rigorous science.

The World Climate Declaration states climate science "should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific."